Friday, September 5, 2008

Biden on Biden

john walker | 8:20 PM | Be the first to comment!
Because Michael dropped the plagiarism dig against Biden , let's review the history ("Please let's not," I can hear you cry).

The allegations surfaced during the Senator's 1987 run for the Democratic nomination for president, a nomination that ultimately went to Michael Dukakis, who was soundly thumped by George H.W. Bush. On September 12th of that year, an article ran in the New York Times with the headline: "Biden's Debate Finale: An Echo from Abroad." Its author was the inimitable Maureen Dowd. That article featured some serious prose positing that Biden had lifted entire sections of British Labor Party politician Neil Kinnock's stump speech without attribution. Biden, the article said, "lifted Mr. Kinnock's closing speech with phrases, gestures and lyrical Welsh syntax intact for his own closing speech at a debate at the Iowa State Fair on Aug. 23 - without crediting Mr. Kinnock."

It's true. Absolutely true. Here's Biden's account of his speech at the Iowa State Fair, as recounted in his 2007 memoir, Promises to Keep:
When we left the stage, one of my staff members grabbed me and said, 'You know you didn't mention Kinnock?' I hadn't found a place to stop and slip in the standard attribution. There was a big pack of reporters who had climbed up on the stage to talk to candidates and their proxies.

All I had to do was gather the reporter and say, Hey, folks, I want to make it clear, on the record, that was a bit I end my stump speeces with, and I should have credited Kinnock. I didn't say, 'as Kinnock said.' I should have. I always do. It's his language.
I wish I had. (p.186)
Here, also, is his account of the Dowd article.
I don't remember Maureen Dowd being at the Iowa State Fair, and I don't remember her ever being out on the road with me, but she'd clearly done some reporting in the weeks since the fair. Deep in the story Dowd noted that I had credited Kinnock at various campaign appearances in August . . .

But nowhere in the story did she mention that she'd received a copy of a videotape with my State Fair close and a copy of the Kinnock ad from Dukakis's campaign. Nor did she report that the Dukakis campaign had also peddled the tape to the Des Moines Register and NBC News. (p. 190)
It was a piece he regularly used (and was known to other reporters for using), and a piece he always attributed. Except at the Iowa State Fair on August 23rd.

A week later, another New York Times story ran, this one by E.J. Dione, the guy you've been hearing analyzing the conventions for NPR the last two weeks. That story was the fruit of Dionne's chasing a nugget about Biden getting caught plagiarising a paper in law school. The headline read, "Biden Admits Plagiarism in School But Says It Was Not 'Malevolent'. It lead with this paragraph:
Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., fighting to salvage his Presidential campaign, today acknowledged ''a mistake'' in his youth, when he plagiarized a law review article for a paper he wrote in his first year at law school.
Here is how the Senator (who was at the time presiding over the Senate confirmation hearing of Reagan's Supreme Court nominee Judge Robert Bork) recalls reading the Dionne article:
Buried in the piece was the recollection of Robert Anderson, who had been in the faculty meeting where my case came up. He said the question of my mistake had been such small potatoes he hadn't even remembered it. 'It is not an uncommon occurence for a freshman to get screwed up on the acknowledgment he should have used,' Anderson had told the Times reporter. (p. 202)
Here, for what it's worth, is Biden's account of the actual law school plagiarism incident:
About six weeks into the first term I botched a paper in a technical writing course so badly that one of my classmates accused me of lifting passages from a Fordham Law Review article; I had cited the article, but not properly. The truth was, I hadn't been to class enough to know how to do citations in a legal brief. The faculty put my case on the agenda of one of their regular meetings, and I had to go in and explain myself. The deans and the professors were satisfied that I had not intentionally cheated, but they told me I'd have to retake the course the next year. They meant to put the fear of God in me; the basic message was that I had better show some discipline or I'd never get through the first year. But the dean of the law school wrote a note to the dean who oversaw my work as a resident advisor: 'In spite of what happened, I am of the opinion that this is a perfectly sound young man.' (p. 36)
The long-and-short of the '87 reporting was that Biden dropped out of the race. That, more or less, is the story.

Obviously, it serves one's interest to describe such failings in the "aw, shucks" tone so given to memoirs like Promises to Keep. For a politician, these are not light allegations. But Biden has never treated them lightly. He has described the infractions as being born of a lack of discipline, laziness, and arrogance. He has been his own worst critic in the matter.

Anyway, there's your history lesson for the day.
Read more ...

Community Oranizing II

john walker | 1:14 PM | Be the first to comment!
CNN's Roland Martin on Palin's mockery of Community Organizers:
Read more ...

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Biden on Leadership

john walker | 6:57 AM | Be the first to comment!
Check out this video from Biden's 1988 run for President in which he argues with a reporter over his "credentials" at the time. The payoff in the clip is the riff on the leader's task of "changing attitudes."
Read more ...

Biden on Palin's Speech

john walker | 6:46 AM | Be the first to comment!
"When we debate -- and, boy, she's going to be a tough debater, she's going to be a skillful debater -- I'm going to try to talk about the differences of our worldview here and what we're going to do for the country."

"I didn't hear the phrase 'middle class.' I didn't hear a single word about health care. I didn't hear a single word about helping people get to college."

Atta boy, Joe.

From CNN's "American Morning" today.
Read more ...

Palin Lies, Lies, and Then Lies Some More

john walker | 6:34 AM | Be the first to comment!
That bleeding heart tool of the angry left, the Associated Press, does some fact-checking on Palin's speech last night. Read the whole piece here.

Here's a tasty taste:
PALIN: "I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending ... and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. I told the Congress 'thanks but no thanks' for that Bridge to Nowhere."

THE FACTS: As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million. In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation. While Palin notes she rejected plans to build a $398 million bridge from Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport, that opposition came only after the plan was ridiculed nationally as a "bridge to nowhere."
Read more ...

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Community Organizing

john walker | 9:24 PM | Be the first to comment!
What is there to mock about that work? Both Palin and Guiliani ripped on Obama's experience as a community organizer tonight. For Guiliani is was a sort of inside joke among conservatives that all he had to say was, "community (pause, pause) organizer" and hearty chuckles spread throughout the room.

Palin's line had something to do with the difference between an organizer and a mayor being that a mayor actually has to make decisions. Something tells me she hasn't the faintest idea what a community organizer on the south side of Chicago would do all day.
Read more ...

The Producer (Let's Do Lunch)

john walker | 7:21 AM | Be the first to comment!
The three of us are having lunch at the Black Cow Cafe on a busy Tuesday. Rather, The Producer and I are having burgers, while the daughter is sleeping in her car seat on a chair next to us. Every bite I take of my "Frisco Burger" produces stringy sauteed onions cascading out of the bun and onto my chin. It's truly delightful.

The Producer is tired. He's just back from a weekend in Denver, and after our lunch he's headed to the office--the new office. The production company had to move from Beverly Hills to Hollywood, since the landlord kept driving up the rent. No matter, I think, Hollywood's a better locale for a production company anyway. I don't speak this.

His grizzled appearance bespeaks more oppression today than carefree style. After 18 months of struggling to get a project off the ground, he still has nothing to show for it. There are things in the works, but in the works stopped being exciting about six months ago. Now the lack of a concrete success to point to causes The Producer to question whether this business is for him.

I listen, sympathetic. I want The Producer to have success. I've enjoyed a few stolen moments in which to watch him do what a producer does, explaining to an angry director why timelines keep getting extended, demanding that a production company commit to a project or back the Hell off; he's really good.

But he's really earnest, and everything I've seen about the entertainment industry, every bit of anecdotal wisdom about it, says that the earnestness of the young is nothing but the grist for other people's mills--namely older, better-connected, wealthier peoples' mills. All this business needs to get one over on you is the ounce of trust you put in it. And by the time you discover what's going on, it's too late.

It's not yet too late for The Producer. There are promising projects on the radar. But if one of them doesn't come through soon, I don't know how much longer he'll be able to hang in. Frankly, for his sake, I hope not that much longer. There are enterprises in the world more deserving of his earnestness than this one.
Read more ...
Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

Search

Pages

Powered by Blogger.