Thursday, November 20, 2008

Things Aint What They Used To Be

john walker | 3:31 PM | Be the first to comment!
The Center for Digital Media and Learning has published the findings of its three-year ethnographic study of youth and digital culture. There's great stuff in here, like this description of a 17 year-old romantic couple who use a variety of technologies to be in constant contact with each other:
Each day, the couple wakes up together by logging onto MSN to talk between taking their showers and doing their hair. They then switch to conversing over their mobile phones as they travel to school, exchanging text messages throughout the school day. After school they tend to get together to do their homework, during which they talk and play a video game. When not together, they continue to talk on the phone and typically end the night on the phone or sending a text message to say good night and “I love you."
If these technologies had been available when I was in high school, I would have used them like a fiend. The important finding of the study, though, is that the technologies don't create new relationships, only extend and enhance existing ones.

Here's the lead researcher, Mizuko Ito, explaining some of the findings.
Read more ...

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Slip of the Tongue

john walker | 11:14 AM | Be the first to comment!
As she stood fumbling with the microphone and facing he fellow Presbyterian Women, I know the greeter had too much to think about to be overly careful about her introduction of the guest speaker from Presbyterian Disaster Assistance.

So when she introduced him by saying, "He's worked for years on the Presbyterian disaster" I could either chuckle or suspect her as an insurgent from The Layman.

Chuckle. Chuckle.
Read more ...

Monday, November 17, 2008

In Praise of Newsprint

john walker | 12:11 PM | Be the first to comment!
Andrew Sullivan links today to a quote by Rupert Murdoch in which the global media tycoon assesses the prospects for the future of newspapers. The long-and-short of it is that newspapers are evolving to meet the demands of an information-hungry public, becoming less newspapers and more newsbrands. Assumed in this prognosis is the continued decline of actual subscriptions to actual newspapers. Nobody disputes this.

I've been subscribing to my local paper four days a week for almost two months now. It's the first time in years that I've paid for a paper. I justified the expense (which I incurred at the hands of a salesman in the grocery store) with a less-than-humble recognition that to be a subscriber to a major west coast daily confers upon one an inarguable aura of coolness. Still, my subscription to the paper is shaping up to be a very positive force on my life. I even mentioned to m'lady this morning that upgrading the subscription to every day might be worth it.

Here it is: the paper's website is set as my browser homepage, but I probably read one story for every 10 headlines I see there. With the printed version in my hand, it's much easier for me to begin to read a story with a headline I find less-than-captivating, then discover, two paragraphs in, that I'm hooked by a good story and end up reading the whole thing. When I arrive at the final sentence, I feel good: like I just learned something or flexed some otherwise atrophied muscle in my brain. I don't get that feeling from hypertext, even if I read the whole story.

Also, I can go back to a story in the paper that I passed over earlier. Maybe I was in a rush, or maybe I was just skimming to see what's in there, but I didn't read the story. I saw it, though, and now I remember it's there, and I'm gonna go find it and at least begin to read it. Online, that won't ever happen. If I skip the headline once, it's gone. I've clicked on something else or linked to another site, and I may never see that headline again. If I do see it again (say, the next time I open my browser) I'll hardly notice it.

Just saying, I like holding the paper in my hand. The little ritual of reading the paper is creeping its way into my routine, and, I must say, I quite like it.
Read more ...

Landonville and Kairosblog Return

john walker | 7:51 AM | Be the first to comment!
Read more ...

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Dayton Moore Isn't Stupid

john walker | 4:03 PM | Be the first to comment!
Last week NPH's affliction of a baseball team made a trade for a free swinging, power hitting first baseman. News of the trade had hardly hit cyberspace before the army of Royals bloggers were on it, decrying it as a meaningless, if not foolish move (I'd link to the posts, but they're long on letters and short on nuance). I don't let the ability to publish on a blog delude me into thinking I know a durn thing about this business, and I have no reason to doubt that people like Rany Jazayerli know exactly what they're talking about. But they've reduced the game of baseball to a mathematic equation in which the correct compilation of digits--percentages! percentages!--will automatically churn out a playoff team.

The surprising low budget success of the Oakland Athletics and Billy Beane, as chronicled by Michael Lewis' engrossing book Moneyball, has spawned a generation of stathead baseball fans who have a higher reverence for Bill James than for Babe Ruth. I'm fascinated by what Beane was able to do in Oakland. It heralded a new era in baseball, really, one in which a player's performance is seen less in terms of potential and more in terms of the raw data of his production. And there's a new statistical formula for assessing that production engineered every day: VORP, OPS, OBP--take your pick.

So when Dayton Moore said that the Royals' offense needed to address its very, very bad On Base Percentage (OBP), the bloggers shouted in acclamation. It shan't be long, they opined, before Kansas City has its own wonder of calculus on the diamond. But then he traded for Jacobs, a player who's OBP is really terrible. Out came the torches.

Moore became the GM of the Royals in the middle of the 2006 season, and I've already chronicled the team's improvement since his arrival. That, to me, buys him a lot of credit, because the teams he's run out there every summer have been different from one another in minimal respects (add a Gil Meche and Jose Guillen here, take away an Angel Berroa there). And yet they're getting better.

What blogger-dom seems not to perceive is that Moore is trying to build an excellent organization, not simply a feel good story of unappreciated talents mined for their maximum potential. So given the chance to acquire a raw, power hitting first baseman who never walks but who could hit 30 homers a year for well into the team's future, he'll scrap the stat and nab the player. Then he'll address On Base Percentage some other way; just maybe he's got a plan to improve Jacobs' OBP.

Beane's A's won lots of games and a few division titles. But they barely sniffed the World Series for all those wins. That, for Moore, is not a model to emulate. After all, Moore cut his teeth in Atlanta, where the Braves won 14 consecutive division titles, a span in which they went to the World Series five times.

I'm operating from a different assumption than the one animating bloggers' twitchy fingers: Dayton Moore knows more than they do.
Read more ...

Monday, November 10, 2008

"That Doesn't Look Like A Riot to Me"

john walker | 11:55 AM | Be the first to comment!
California's Proposition 8 passed last week, eliminating the right of same-sex couples to marry in the state. Beginning the day after the election, opponents of the measure, upset by the outcome, began gathering in vigil and protest, most notably in front of the LDS church in Westwood. They're upset by the support that church provided to the passage of the proposition.

Over the weekend someone emailed me a "news bulletin" claiming that Christians were being targeted with threats of violence by these protesters. The story came from World Net Daily featured the headline: "'Gay' threats target Christians over marriage ban." The story's evidence of that serious claim? A comment left on a single blog.

By contrast, the LA Times coverage of the protests has asserted things like,
Police guided the demonstrators through the streets for more than three hours without major confrontations. No arrests were reported.
Then yesterday the Family Research Council's Tony Perkins went on CNN and claimed that the protesters were "rioting." The remark comes at about 2:55.


When asked "Where were the riots," Perkins answers, "There were arrests the other night."

Do the math: some arrests=a riot.

No matter how you come out on this issue, it is certainly disconcerting to see people who's position is based wholly on moral conviction demonstrating such a callous disregard for the truth.
Read more ...

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Bagging for Biden: It's All Over (And It's Only Just Begun)

john walker | 8:42 PM | Be the first to comment!
Biden is the Vice President.

Be still, my beating heart.


Read more ...

Monday, November 3, 2008

Nothing Is More Than Something

john walker | 11:43 AM | Be the first to comment!
With the downturn in the economy, churches are receiving more and more phone calls from people asking for help. Most of these calls, at least in my church's case, come from people outside the congregation, people who, more likely than not, found a listing in a phone book and cold called with a story and a plea: the mortgage is due; the electricity is being disconnected; the car needs gas.

Whoever fields these calls wants to help. We all feel a powerful pull to help, to wave a magic charity wand and fix the situation. If we could, we would become need technicians, men and women who know just which button to push to get the bank of the single mother's back or put some petrol in the family Chevy. We could traffic in gas and grocery gift cards, vouchers for services, memorandums of understanding with utility companies, and so salvage situation after situation from the brink of catastrophe.

There is some success to be had here. But it is a grudging success that comes with the tacit expectation that the next billing cycle will bring the same panicked phone call from the same person. Regardless, it's success worth aiming for, because if you can keep a family's water from being shut off you should.

But I'm realizing--sloooowly--that there's a lot more work to be done in these kinds of situations and a whole lot less workers. If you need food, there are innumerable food pantries around. Clothes? No problem: charities are overflowing with donations. Even medical care can be provided for those who have absolutely nothing.

If you have something, though, and you're scraping and clawing to hold on to it, then you're much, much harder to help. There really aren't any organizations to help you pay your rent, and in the end the utility company is going to collect its money from somebody. Because it costs a lot more to keep people in homes and cars than it does to simply give them food, clothing, and a night's shelter. If you're homeless, we can help you; if you're trying to avoid becoming homeless, we're mostly stuck.

Once you've been evicted, though, and the car has been repossessed, come see us and we'll give you some non-perishables.

It makes one sick with helplessness.
Read more ...

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Doctors Against Prop 8

john walker | 9:42 PM | Be the first to comment!
The California chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics is opposing Proposition 8, the ballot initiative that seeks to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry. Here's their reasoning:
The physical growth, development, social and mental well-being of all children is supported by allowing parents a full range of parental legal rights, such as Social Security survivor benefits, health benefits for dependent children, and legally recognized consent for education and medical decisions. In order to protect and promote the best interests of the child, the AAP-CA supports equal access for all California children to the legal, financial and emotional protections of civil marriage for their parents, without discrimination based on family structure.
So much for the Yes on 8 campaign's "do it for the kids" argument.
Read more ...

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Eating Their Own Tail

john walker | 10:14 PM | Be the first to comment!
Jeffrey Feldman said today that the scores of clips from McCain and Palin rallies in which supporters hurl racist epithets have become the dominant images of the campaign. While the post is given to some hyperbole, Feldman is hitting on what I think is the story as the race draws to a close: John McCain's campaign is dying a self-inflicted death, as the worst tendencies and instincts of white conservatives have taken center stage.

Beginning with the Palin pick, McCain ceded his message to the practitioners of divisive identity politics. It bore immediate fruit, as Republicans who had theretofore been cool on the Arizona Senator immediately got on board. You could feel it in Palin's early speeches, and especially during the convention: conservatives passionately embraced the McCain campaign as something that looked and sounded like them.

If it had stopped there, things might be different. But, beginning with Guiliani's and Palin's jabs at community organizers from the convention podium, the Republican campaign's message turned to the "difference" of his opponent, employing terminolgy about his "secrets" and asking "Who is Barack Obama?" In doing this, McCain began allowing unqualified and unaccountable people to say things on his behalf that made mainstream Americans a little sick to their stomachs. Thus, the people introducing him at rallies started referring regularly to Barack "Hussein" Obama. When McCain failed to put a stop to it, the wheels began to fall off.

Yes, Palin's interview with Katie Couric hurt. Yes, the financial crisis and McCain's faux campaign suspension amplified the problems. And no, SNL's parodies didn't do the camp any favors. But the legacy of McCain's failed campaign will be the scenes from these rallies. It will be supporters in Pennsylvania and Ohio making shooting gestures with their hands and disavowing the prospect of a black president. In the face of this ugliness, all McCain could do was double down on his bet with the devil and praise his supporters.

Joe the Plumber's campaign appearance today and the ignorance it put on display is merely postscript. Because from right wing shock jocks to an inexperienced and unknown VP pick and finally to an obscure right wing hothead, John McCain has repeatedly allowed the wrong people to do his talking for him. His wager has been that enough Americans will see themselves in such unrefined and unprofessional personalities. If the polls are to be believed, it's a wager he's about to lose in embarrasing fashion.

All Obama has to do is wait for the desperate and undisciplined mouths of McCain's surrogates to swallow the rest of the campaign's body.
Read more ...

Monday, October 27, 2008

It's Over

john walker | 4:13 PM | Be the first to comment!
I've voted, cast my absentee ballot in the largest voting district in the country, done all the research and filled in all the circles, sealed it, signed it, and sent it in.

I've only posted one item about this state's Proposition 8. I've known for some time how I would probably vote on it, but I remained open to wisdom and direction until Saturday, when I'd heard enough. The argument about the need for legal, social, and biological protections engendered in traditional marriage to be preserved hovered at the back of my mind for days.

On Saturday the wife was phoned by a Yes on 8 volunteer who warned that failure of the proposition would result in lawsuits against churches refusing to marry same-gender couples and in a mandate for public schools to promote those marriages. Neither of those claims are true (are synagogues sued that refuse to marry non-Jews? Catholic churches that won't marry divorced people? And the California Teachers' Association is forcefully opposing the measure), and yet this well-intentioned volunteer was spending her morning stating that they were, motivated largely, she professed, by her religious convictions.

After weeks of editorials, calls from Focus on the Family, yard signs, and newspaper ads, this call cemented what had been my pervasive leaning all along. What it made clear was that advocates of the measure are passionately concerned to defend an institution, marriage, that they believe has been instituted by God. The subject of Proposition 8 is, after all, marriage: who can participate in it and who cannot.

I too believe that marriage is a God-given institution, and yet I lack the zeal for protecting or preserving or defending it evidenced by Proposition 8's supporters. I've made my peace with the competing claim in all of this, that who and who is not admitted into a people's institutions is a matter of civil rights and that to deny access to an institution's legal and social benefits and responsibilities to a group of people based on an inherent characteristic of those people is wrong. It's a moral problem. God doesn't like it. It's wrong when it pertains to race. It's wrong when it pertains to gender. It's wrong when it pertains to sexual orientation.

Ultimately, I'm not persuaded that an institution ordained by God needs such vehement human policing. For one, proponents of "traditional" marriage have a tendency to amplify the importance of family in the Biblical narratives, overlooking the ways in which the God of the Bible repeatedly sends people out, away from the family as a traditional institution (Jesus is a pretty good example). But more to the point, such frenzied patrolling of marriage as a tradition belies a lack of belief in that very tradition. To truly believe in something is to trust that it does not depend upon your effort for its survival.

Praising the no-frills naturalistic painting style employed by his father, Thomas Merton says, ". . . a religious man respects the power of God's creation to bear witness for itself." I read that sentence, tucked neatly into the opening paragraphs of Merton's memoir The Seven Storey Mountain, on Saturday afternoon.

Then I put down the book and voted.
Read more ...

Friday, October 24, 2008

What's on Your Ballot II

john walker | 9:36 AM | Be the first to comment!
Proposition 8 is the most notorious of the 12 ballot propositions Californians will vote on in just over a week. It's a measure to "eliminate the right" of same sex couples to marry, a right that was granted by the California Supreme Court on May 15th (this blogger's birthday).

You're for this or you're not; there's very little grey. Among those for are the LDS church, Focus on The Family, and the Knights of Columbus. The opposed include the California Teachers' Association, Pacific Gas & Energy, and Brad Pitt.

This week saw the release of threatening letters sent by the "Yes on 8" campaign to entities that have given money to defeat it. They are clear in their message: withdraw your support from the opposition, give us money, or else. Read one such letter here. Money quote:

"Were you to elect to donate comparably, it would be a clear indication that you are in opposition to traditional marriage. You would leave us no other reasonable assumption. The names of any companies or organizations that choose not to donate in like manner to Protectmarriage.com but have given to Equality California will be published. It is only fair for Proposition 8 supporters to know which companies and organizations oppose traditional marriage.
Classy.
Read more ...

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Accused

john walker | 2:33 PM | Be the first to comment!
I received an email today from a member of the congregation that heard me preach last Sunday, expressing distress that I had "brought politics into" the sermon and that I did so "in a manner that was disparaging of others."

I promptly responded with thanks to the congregant (preachers really do appreciate negative feedback. Really). I told the person that I was going to look at my manuscript again to see exactly where that charge arises from, but that I don't like the notion that anything I might have said was disparaging. "I don't believe a sermon should ever do that," I said, "and if mine did on Sunday then I will chalk it up to less-than-careful thought about the subject beforehand and resolve to not make the same mistake again."

Here's what the manuscript says:
"The question about paying taxes [the text was Matthew 22's story where the Pharisees and Herodians plot to entrap Jesus with a question about paying taxes to the emperor] is a slippery political football having next-to-nothing to do with money. Witness our newest American everyman celebrity, Joe the Plumber. For Joe, the question is hardly about tax codes and income brackets and W-4's. Rather, if you've seen his exchange with the candidate caught on tape, you know that it's about him. 'I'm a hard working guy,' he says. 'I've worked hard all my life.' For Joe (and, I imagine, all of us), it becomes about our hard work, the things we've sweated and toiled to achieve for ourselves and our families. It becomes about us, who we perceive ourselves to be, who we aspire to be, and who we allow a say in those aspirations.

It is when we're dealing with those aspirations and high ideals, though, that we are most likely to contradict ourselves. It didn't take reporters very long to discover that Joe the Plumber hasn't paid his income taxes in quite some time. Our most lofty convictions are undermined by our most routine habits. We can be, I'm afraid, the worst enemy of our most cherished causes. Like the vocal supporter of 'tough on crime' legislation with his own criminal record or the 'protect marriage' advocate who hasn't said 'I love you' to her spouse in weeks, we can betray our aspirations without even knowing it. And it's never worse than when it has to do with money."
The verdict I have to reach when I read that back is that both charges (bringing politics into the sermon and disparaging people) are true. The latter bothers me. The former doesn't. That a preacher would bring politics into any given sermon is right and good, especially when it serves to put politics into conversation with the gospel. Preachers ought not be partisans in the pulpit, mind, but ought to afford congregants an opportunity to see the political in the routine and the petty in the political. Preaching itself is a political act.

To disparage, though, seems somehow un-Godly. The mistake in the text quoted above lies not in the mentioning of political situations like campaigns, crime legislation, and the fight over marriage, bur rather a one-sided use of those situations to illustrate a larger point. Surely an illustration could have been drawn from, say, and environmental advocate who contradicts his lofty cause in his routine habits. Taken separately, the illustrations about the tough on crime proponent and the defend marriage advocate are not disparaging; collectively they are.

And the point about Joe the Plumber's income taxes kind of fails, in retrospect, to illustrate the point it's supposed to illustrate. That's sloppiness, which, to my mind, is a less pardonable homiletical offense.

Talking money and politics in church is dangerous business. The good news here, I believe, is that when we make a misstep the worst thing that comes is an email. And the chance to reexamine your work, which never hurts.

I plead guilty.
Read more ...

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

What the Wasilla?!

john walker | 1:54 PM | Be the first to comment!
Thank goodness for Comedy Central:

Read more ...

Monday, October 20, 2008

McCain's New Speechwriter: Studs Terkel

john walker | 9:04 PM | Be the first to comment!
The Arizona Senator seems to have channeled the spirit of that great American essayist and chronicler of working people from Detroit to Duluth. In college I had a bit part in the musical "Working," an adaptation of Terkel's book with the same name. The musical features songs with titles like, "Millwork," "Just a Housewife," "The Mason," "Brother Trucker," and "Cleanin' Women." Check out this video of Patti LaBelle in the film adaptation:



I make this comparison after reading a story on The LA Times' website about McCain's efforts to win Missouri. After exposing Joe the Plumber to the country in last week's debate, he's now throwing out references to workers of every stripe at a Terkel-esque speed:
McCain portrays Joe Wurzelbacher as a symbol for all Americans struggling to get by. Among them, to hear McCain tell it, are Phil the Bricklayer, Wendy the Waitress and Rose the Teacher. On Monday, he added Ed the Dairyman.


Seriously. Who writes this stuff?
Read more ...

Friday, October 17, 2008

Ahh

john walker | 7:45 PM | Be the first to comment!
I'm sitting down with a glass of Montevina Pinot Grigio and getting ready to dive into the fourth season of The X-Files, thanks to Netflix. After that I'll try to read a Cynthia Ozick essay before bed. Tomorrow has a sermon that needs written.

Two really nice things happened today. One, Meredith and I took Baby Girl to the park for half an hour or so. We stopped and got ice cream on the way. After fussing and crying intermittently throughout the day, the park was just the thing. She calmed right down and took in the swings, the trees, the other children. The world sighed a collective sigh of relief.

The other nice thing happened on the way to the park as I sat in the car and waited for Meredith to get through the very long ice cream line. It was a brief phone conversation with my friend The Producer, the kind of conversation that serves no effective purpose but which lifts your spirits and gives you an occasion to laugh after a draining day. He reminded me of this video, written by and starring Ben Schwartz, a really funny up-and-coming comic. Much love.

Now, to Mulder and Scully . . .
Read more ...

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Wednesday is Thursday is Wednesday

john walker | 8:29 AM | Be the first to comment!
Late last week someone sent me an email about an upcoming meeting, saying that the time conflicted with the third Presidential debate on Wednesday night so they weren't coming. No worries, that meeting was actually scheduled for Thursday.

Yesterday someone called to confirm a Thursday appointment and said, "I'm just confirming that I'll see you on Wednesday." I called back and clarified: the appointment is on Thursday.

This morning I drove 30 minutes to an 8:00 appointment, only to discover that it was scheduled for, you guessed it, Thursday.

What kind of day-swap vortex have I entered?
Read more ...

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Seriously?

john walker | 11:59 AM | Be the first to comment!


Hindus, Buddhists, and Muslims the world over are praying for an Obama win, and if their prayers are heard they will believe that their god is bigger than John McCain's.

What serious leader allows this kind of religious peeing contest language at his events? Seriously.
Read more ...

Monday, October 13, 2008

The Things You Learn

john walker | 1:36 PM | Be the first to comment!
If you own a Honda Civic made prior to 2001, the car doesn't have an immobilizer system installed. So if you should lose your key, and then lose your backup key, inexplicably misplacing it between the switching off of the ignition, the closing of the door, and the supposed depositing of the key into your pocket, then any Honda dealer can cut you a new key with only your registration to prove ownership.

Let's hear it for old cars.
Read more ...

Friday, October 10, 2008

The Genie

john walker | 7:17 PM | Be the first to comment!
"I don't trust Obama. I have read about him and he's an Arab."

That's the kind of opinion being voiced at John McCain's town hall meetings these days. That such a view can find voice at this late stage in a national presidential campaign is the result of months of disinformation spread by groups at the conservative fringe and "reported" by Fox News and company.

But now that the McCain campaign has unleashed the hounds, as it were, and spent the last seven days spinning out ad after ad trafficking in suspicion of Obama's past and introducing the phrase "palling around with terrorists" into our discourse, we're getting a good look at what, exactly, this tack is dredging up amongst the electorate: rage.

It's obvious that McCain is taken aback by it (observe the look on his face here when the shout "kill him!" issues from one of his supporters). He's not this kind of guy. But it seems to me he's made a deal with the devil and taken some very desperate advice from the wrong people. Or, to use a different metaphor, he's let the genie out of the bottle, and now that genie is going to do with genies do, namely wreak havoc and make McCain wish he could stop it.

When this election is over, I don't think McCain wants to be remembered as the guy who's run for the White House set American race relations back 50 years. But that's what people are describing at McCain/Palin events, an environment of anger and suspicion that feels, at times, like it might burst the dam of civility.
Read more ...

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Rage Against The Machine

john walker | 10:33 AM | Be the first to comment!
The well-documented McCain/Palin offensive of the last week has shown me one thing clearly: one candidate in this race is tapping into peoples' hopes and aspirations, and the other is drudging up their fear and anger.

Surely, they're talking to different people. Obama is appealing to liberally inclined Americans, many of them young and many of them ambivalent to electoral politics. In doing so he's utilizing soaring rhetoric about "hope" and "change." There's not much novel about it. It's actually quite conventional for a candidate running from the party that has been on the outside of the executive for the last two terms.

But McCain and Palin are not speaking to the politically ambivalent. They're appealing to men and women who would sooner eat glass than vote for a Democrat. And they're marshaling that body's sense of victim-hood, of anger and indignation, in order to push them to the polls. More than one observer has described the atmosphere at McCain's campaign stops as "angry." It's a phenomenon unique to McCain's supporters, and one that they're happy to indulge (allowing their surrogates to warm up the crowd with multiple mentions of Barack Hussein Obama), even if they deny whipping it up. Would anyone at an Obama rally cry, "Kill him!"?

I decided who I was voting for long ago. But if I hadn't, I think the last seven days would have been more than enough to send me running from the frothy-mouthed mobs backing the other guy.
Read more ...

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

You Learn Something New Every Day

john walker | 4:29 PM | Be the first to comment!
I'm preparing a session with the youth at the church about politics, rights, and decision making. Part of that preparation has been researching laws that apply specifically to young people. Here's some of what I discovered:

  • In the city where most of these young people live, it is illegal to operate a tattoo parlor (that one doesn't apply specifically to youth, but it doesn't not apply either).
  • In the same city, "It is unlawful for any minor under the age of eighteen years to loiter, idle, wander, stroll, or aimlessly drive or ride about in or upon any public street, avenue, highway, road, curb area, alley, park, playground, or other public ground, public place, or public building, place of amusement or eating place, vacant lot or unsupervised place between the hours of ten p.m. on any day and sunrise of the immediately following day.
  • The minimum age requirement to run for Governor in the state of California is 18.
  • It is illegal in the state of California to perform a body piercing on a minor without the parent or guardian's actual presence or notarized written authority.

  • It is a misdemeanor to tattoo or offer to tattoo a young person under the age of 18 in California.

Read more ...

Thursday, October 2, 2008

"Let Me Say It Again"

john walker | 10:52 PM | Be the first to comment!
Biden rocked it. He was back on his heels for nearly the first 45 minutes of the debate as Palin exhausted herself with winks and linguistic gimmicks, all of which worked beautifully on television. But you can only keep that up for so long. Biden was steady and consistent, not overagressive and yet not deferential. People will say that Palin exceeded Biden's expectations, and I don't think that's true. Biden has expressed nothing but esteem and high regard for the Governor since the day she was announced. Tonight he showed up her utter lack of substance by the abundance of his own. This exchange on Afghanistan is perhaps the best example.
Read more ...

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Rushkoff on the Credit Crisis

john walker | 8:47 PM | Be the first to comment!
Douglas Rushkoff handles the current financial crisis in his latest piece for Arthur magazine. Read it on his blog here. It's long, so here are some money quotes:

The mortgage and credit crisis wasn’t merely predictable; it was predicted. And not by a market bear or conspiracy theorist, but by the people and institutions responsible. The record number of foreclosures, credit defaults, and, now, institutional collapses is not the result of the churn of random market forces, but rather a series of highly lobbied changes to law, highly promoted ideologies of wealth and home ownership, and monetary policies highly biased toward corporate greed.
And this:
. . . the biggest industry in America—maybe the only real industry left—is credit itself: money is lent into existence by the central bank, and then lent again to regional banks, savings and loans, and eventually to you and me. Each bank along the way takes its cut; the final borrower is the only one who has to figure out how to pay it back, with interest, by the close of the contract.
And this:

Participation in business or, in most of our cases, land or home ownership, means helping put those wheels of the credit industry in motion. And the more we push, the more momentum they gain, and the more influence they have over an increasingly large portion of our experience. Reality becomes defined by credit sectors, and our time is consumed more each day with wondering how we’re going to pay back what we’ve borrowed.

Read more ...

Monday, September 29, 2008

Spinning the Veep Debate Beforehand

john walker | 8:33 PM | Be the first to comment!
Ever since Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain's running mate, we've all looked ahead to her debate with The Orator Joe Biden. On the face of it, the debate is tee'd up for Biden, a politician with a 36 year career in the nation's highest deliberative body. But a more nuanced view of Thursday's debate emerged early on as well.

Biden better be careful, this view goes, not to beat Sarah Palin too badly in the debate. He needs to make sure he doesn't bully her around and so come off as mean and ugly. Proponents of this view (many of whom are Biden's Democratic congressional colleagues) point to the 1988 Vice Presidential debate between Lloyd Bentsen and Dan Quayle.

And in fact, McCain surrogates hit the talk shows early this week to begin spinning the debate that way, four days beforehand. "Gotcha Questions," is what they're predicting, which, of course, come from the school of "Gotcha Journalism" that seeks to crush the loveable Governor.

Let me just say right now that for Biden to try to dial it down during the debate would be a mistake. Dial it down is not Biden's M.O., and if he tries to make it so he will have squandered one of the best chances the Obama ticket is going to get to show voters the stark, stark difference between itself and the McCain alternative.

Biden needs to do what Biden does best. Attack, rail, embellish, pound the lectern, point, whisper--whatever he has in his bag of rhetorical tricks needs to come out. Biden vs. Palin is a tremendous asset for Obama. And if you let your opponent turn your assets into liabilities, you've already lost.
Read more ...

Mental Health Break: Hope for the Royals

john walker | 2:12 PM | Be the first to comment!
Some quick-and-dirty math for all those starry-eyed Royals fans.

Dayton Moore was hired as the Royals General Manager in 2006.

In 2005 the Royals won 56 games.

In 2006 (the year Moore took over) the Royals won 62 games (an improvement of 6 games)

In 2007 the Royals won 69 games (an improvement of 7 games)

Now, with 2008 in the books, we can say that the Royals won 75 games (another improvement of 6 games).

The team is getting better.

If they maintain their rate of improvement over the last three seasons and add 6 to the "win" column in 2009, that will match the number of wins the Cleveland Indians had this year. They finished 7 games out of first place.

If they add another 6 wins in 2010, that's an 87-win season. That's one win less than both the White Sox and Twins accumulated this regular season, and they're tied for first place.

Just sayin'.
Read more ...

Thursday, September 25, 2008

More on Lies

john walker | 7:55 AM | Be the first to comment!
Shankar Vedantam at the Washington Post explains why fact-checking is a useless exercise in a political campaign. Money quote:

As the presidential campaign heats up, intense efforts are underway to debunk rumors and misinformation. Nearly all these efforts rest on the assumption that good information is the antidote to misinformation.

But a series of new experiments show that misinformation can exercise a ghostly influence on people's minds after it has been debunked -- even among people who recognize it as misinformation. In some cases, correcting misinformation serves to increase the power of bad information.

Read more ...

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Bill Moyers on The Efficacy of Lying

john walker | 4:21 PM | Be the first to comment!
On his September 12th show, Bill Moyers gives this phenomenon the metaphor it needs:
. . . news cycles once measured in hours, are now measured in minutes and second. We live inside a media hurricane, an unrelenting force of attacks and counterattacks hatched in partisan quarters and hurled into cyberspace with such velocity the poor little truth is blown away like signposts on the gulf coast. Try getting a false or misleading charge retracted once it's made. You cannot un-ring a bell. Try and you'll find yourself an "enemy of the people." One Republican official told journalists in St. Paul, "We will get with you if you keep messing with us." And as John McCain and Sarah Palin barnstormed the nation this week, crowds that came out to see them booed members of the press.

"You cannot un-ring a bell."

Thank you Bill.
Read more ...

What's on Your Ballot?

john walker | 10:09 AM | | Be the first to comment!
Thanks to SmartVoter, I now know that I will be asked to vote on this question in November:

Shall certain farm animals be allowed, for the majority of every day, to fully extend their limbs or wings, lie down, stand up and turn around?
The real question, I think, is if they shall be allowed to do the hokey-pokey and to turn themselves around. I mean, that's what it's all about.

The full text of the Proposition 2 (also known as the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act) can be found here.
Read more ...

Monday, September 15, 2008

Exactly

john walker | 8:07 AM | Be the first to comment!
Cathleen Decker validates what I've been complaining about for weeks now: in presidential politics, lying is effective. Money quote:

". . . a campaign adage has proved itself again: Repeat something often enough, and it becomes real, even when it isn't."
Read more ...

Friday, September 12, 2008

Restaurant Wars

john walker | 3:08 PM | Be the first to comment!
I'm delighted to find myself on this blog, even though it gives the lie to my belief that I was an excellent waiter, especially with the large tables.
Read more ...

Thursday, September 11, 2008

McCain's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Ads

john walker | 9:15 PM | Be the first to comment!
What a week for the McCain advertising staff. They've put out four ads this week, and the nonpartisan operation Factcheck.org has called out every single one of them. First, this ad claiming that Obama is trying to "destroy" Governor Palin, an ad which makes use of a quote from Factcheck itself:


Per Factcheck:

They call the ad "Fact Check." It says "the attacks on Gov. Palin have been called 'completely false' ... 'misleading.' " On screen is a still photo of a grim-faced Obama. Our words are accurately quoted, but they had nothing to do with Obama.
If you're going to out Factcheck Factcheck, you better get your facts straight.

Next was the ad that Joe Klein said was one of the sleaziest ads he's ever seen:


You won't see a more direct attempt to exploit the explosive intersection of the two biggest taboos in America: race and sex. Again, Factcheck:
Obama, contrary to the ad's insinuation, does not support explicit sex education for kindergarteners. And the bill, which would have allowed only "age appropriate" material and a no-questions-asked opt-out policy for parents, was not his accomplishment to claim in any case, since he was not even a cosponsor – and the bill never left the state Senate.
Finally, there is the spot just released claiming that Obama is trying to "belittle" Governor Palin:

The worst part of this one is the shot of Obama's clenched jaw overlaid with the scolding narrator's voice: "How disrespectful." Why not throw a "boy" on the end of that for good measure?

Once again, Factcheck:
The new McCain-Palin ad "Lashing Out" begins like an earlier ad we criticized, with its reference to Barack Obama's celebrity, but then goes down new paths of deception. It takes quotes from news organizations and uses them out of context in an effort to portray Obama and his running mate, Joe Biden, as unfairly attacking Sarah Palin and making sexist remarks. We've long been a critic of candidates (Obama included) usurping the credibility of independent news organizations and peddling false quotes, and this ad is particularly egregious.
Surely this will backfire?
Read more ...

Acquire the Fi---Deleted!

john walker | 12:05 PM | Be the first to comment!
"Hi, Rocky, this is ______ with Acquire the Fire Youth Ministries. I just hope your day's just going awesome and you're being blessed by the Lord today . . ."

Oh, man. How did these guys get my number?
Read more ...

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Chasing the Skaters

john walker | 4:27 PM | Be the first to comment!
It was told me on my first day at the church: we have to chase away the skaters.

Well-intentioned kids though they may be, we have to chase away the skaters.

Though they be covered with helmets and pads, we have to chase away the skaters.

Through eight months on the staff here I have shirked this responsibility, feigning ignorance on almost every occasion. But when I returned to the building this afternoon and found my way to the office blocked by a crowd of six junior high schoolers kicking, flipping, and jumping their boards over backpacks on the patio, I had no escape. To walk through that crowd and utter nary a word of reproach would be bald insubordination.

I am no insubordinate (Jesus may have been; I am not. Yet).

So I forced a friendly, "What's up guys?" and a jovial self-introduction before spitting on their community. "We can't have you guys skating here," is how I put it. "You can hang out here, but you can't be on your skateboards."

Of course, they weren't surprised by this. This was certainly not the first time someone has chased them out of here, and it was most definitely not the first time they've been run off, for that experience is as central to the culture of skating as water is to surfing.

I asked where else they can skate. "Way up there," indicated one with a wave of his arm towards the high school, about a mile away.

"Not at the junior high?" I asked, hopeful.

"No," another one answered. "They kicked us out."

So here I am, pastor at a church, and forced to see the presence of vibrant and creative kids as a problem, forced to see them through a litigious lens as a threat and so to disperse their company with sighs and grumbles.

There has to be a better answer.
Read more ...

Liar (WaPo's Version)

john walker | 8:33 AM | Be the first to comment!
Following up on an earlier item, the Washington Post has a story today about untruths becoming facts before they're undone. Money quote:
As the presidential campaign moves into a final, heated stretch, untrue accusations and rumors have started to swirl at a pace so quick that they become regarded as fact before they can be disproved.
Again, once a claim has been established as true, twice as much work has to be done to undo it.
Read more ...

Nothing New Here

john walker | 8:09 AM | Be the first to comment!
The Washington Post's Richard Cohen has an Op-Ed in yesterday's paper where he claims that Obama is being swiftboated, and that he needs to be tougher in responding to it. Money quote:
What Obama does not understand is that he is being Swift-boated. The term does not apply to a mere smear. It is bolder, more outrageous than that. It means going straight at your opponent's strength and maligning it. This is what was done in 2004 to John Kerry, who had commanded a Swift boat in Vietnam. Kerry had won three Purple Hearts, a Silver Star and a Bronze Star and emerged from the war a certified hero. It was that record that his opponents attacked, a tactic Kerry thought so ludicrous that he at first ignored it. The record shows that he lost the election.

The swiftboating of Obama began before Palin's and Guiliani's now infamous "community organizer" jabs. It started at least over the summer with the release of the McCain campaign's "celebrity" ads. Those ads made the claim that Obama is "the biggest celebrity in the world," an obvious attempt to cast the Senator's worldwide recognition and popularity as a liability.

There's little doubt that the ad found its mark among voters. But where it really succeeded was in its effect on Obama. When Obama had a packed stadium of 80,000 people and a television audience of millions more for his acceptance speech at the Democratic convention, he chose to "dial down the rhetoric" and "get in gear" with an address heavy on policy details and light on soaring rhetoric. He didn't, after all, want to look like a celebrity.

Look, Obama's celebrity and his community organizing are strengths--great, great strengths. The McCain camp's job is to attack those strengths as weaknesses, not just on technical merit, but on the basis of Obama's character. A "celebrity" is not a statesman; a "celebrity" is rich, spoiled, and out of touch.

You'll notice that McCain's convention speech offered little-to-no policy details and relied heavily on moving rhetoric around the central narrative of that Senator's campaign, his experience as a POW. So after spooking Obama into giving a relatively tame address and thus squander the biggest mass audience he was ever going to get, McCain stepped right in and gave that audience what it really wanted: a celebrity.
Read more ...

Monday, September 8, 2008

Liar!

john walker | 1:41 PM | Be the first to comment!
Back in June, I read this op-ed in the New York Times. It contains the very juicy claim that "Even when a lie is presented with a disclaimer, people often remember it as true."

The rest of the piece explains how our brains remember things. In short, the human brain does not simply store facts like a computer hard drive. Instead, facts are initially stored in the hippocampus, but then every time we remember those facts, our brain processes and restores them all over again.
In time, the fact is gradually transferred to the cerebral cortex and is separated from the context in which it was originally learned. For example, you know the capital of California is Sacramento, but you probably don't remember how you learned it.
So if a piece of information--say, that Sarah Palin killed the Bridge to Nowhere project--is initially stored as true, subsequent revelations that the information is not true have to work twice as hard to win your brain's ultimate allegiance. Point/counterpoint doesn't work with this stuff. It needs to be more like point/COUNTERPOINT or point/COUNTERPOINTCOUNTERPOINTCOUNTERPOINTCOUNTERPOINT.

You get the idea. And even then there are no guarantees.

Which is what allowed Governor Palin to repeat the claim about the bridge last week during her speech at the Republican National Convention. Even though the previous week had seen the claim thoroughly debunked, the chance to seed such a symbolic idea in the brains of millions of voters was too good to pass up.

Subsequent fact-checks and Daily Show riffs will only raise the indignation of those who knew it to be a misstatement to begin with. Because Palin's intended audience, for whom she had already, in a span of only days, become an emblematic locale for their emotional commitment, has now had that claim deposited in their brain as a fact not once, not twice, but multiple times.

And every time they recall it, their brain processes it as a "fact" one more time, and her symbolic standing as a "maverick" is further and further cemented.
Read more ...

Sunday, September 7, 2008

Biden Reacts to Republican Convention

john walker | 10:33 PM | Be the first to comment!


Money quote:

"Oh I love your dress. Was that your mother's?"
Read more ...

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Biden on Dowd on Biden on Biden

john walker | 7:46 AM | Be the first to comment!
Mo Mo Do brings up further allegations leveled by Maureed Dowd against Joe Biden during his 1987 run for President.

Who knew there was a blog dedicated singularly to Maureen Dowd?

The comment goes like this: "Dowd was also leaked from a Republican t proof that Biden was frequently using Robert Kennedy's speeches without attribution. You can see the quotes here."

The link takes you to a Dowd article from September 16 with the headline "Biden Is Facing Growing Debate On His Speeches." The article lines out a quote from RFK and places it next to an excerpt Biden gave to the California Democratic Convention. Needless to say, there are obvious similarities.

Biden recounts the RFK riff in his memoir, Promises to Keep:
Later that day the San Jose Mercury News was calling. They wanted a response to new allegations. Hadn't I used a Bobby Kennedy quote without attribution in a speech in California, and a Hubert Humphrey line in another? I'd never tried to hide those quotes, but now I was finding out that one of my speechwriters had inserted an RFK line into the speech in California without telling me. People from the Hart campaign had brought it up then. Newsweek correspondent Howard Fineman would refer to the hubbub a few days later as somewhere between a traffic ticket and a minor misdeameanor, but I knew what was happening. There was a hint of blood in the water, and it was mine. These reporters who kept calling, none of whom had any personal experience of me, were starting to see the emergence of a pattern . . . a character flaw. Until then I hadn't seen it coming, or I thought I could handle it. But the alarm bells went off for Jill right away. They were questioning the one thing she saw as my greatest strenght--and something I would never be able to defend with words alone. 'Of all the things to attack you on,' she said, almost in tears. 'Your integrity?' (p. 190-191)
"A speechwriter did it" seems a weak answer to a plagiarism charge. After all, you're ultimately responsible for the words that are coming out of your mouth.

All the same, Biden's contention has always been that to use the language of those who have come before is to honor them and bring them into conversation with todays problems.

As the Governor said of Todd: Biden's still my guy.
Read more ...

Friday, September 5, 2008

Community Organizing IV: Ill Doctrine

john walker | 10:24 PM | Be the first to comment!
Jay Smooth reacts to Guiliani and Palin (at about the 1:10 mark).
Read more ...

Community Organizing III: Rushkoff Weighs In

john walker | 10:15 PM | | Be the first to comment!
Our beloved Douglas Rushkoff blogs today about the Palin and Guiliani speeches on Wednesday night and the scorn those speeches heaped on community organizing. Read the post here. Here's a money quote:
In their attack on community organizing - a word combination they pretended they didn’t know what it meant - Giuliani and Palin revealed their refusal to acknowledge the kinds of bottom-up processes through which our society was built, and through which local communities can begin to assert some authority over their schools, environments, and economies. Without organized communities, you don’t get the reduction in centralized government the Republicans pretend to be arguing for. In their view, community organizing as, at best, equivalent to disruptive and unpredictable Al Qaeda activity.
Read more ...

Biden on Biden

john walker | 8:20 PM | Be the first to comment!
Because Michael dropped the plagiarism dig against Biden , let's review the history ("Please let's not," I can hear you cry).

The allegations surfaced during the Senator's 1987 run for the Democratic nomination for president, a nomination that ultimately went to Michael Dukakis, who was soundly thumped by George H.W. Bush. On September 12th of that year, an article ran in the New York Times with the headline: "Biden's Debate Finale: An Echo from Abroad." Its author was the inimitable Maureen Dowd. That article featured some serious prose positing that Biden had lifted entire sections of British Labor Party politician Neil Kinnock's stump speech without attribution. Biden, the article said, "lifted Mr. Kinnock's closing speech with phrases, gestures and lyrical Welsh syntax intact for his own closing speech at a debate at the Iowa State Fair on Aug. 23 - without crediting Mr. Kinnock."

It's true. Absolutely true. Here's Biden's account of his speech at the Iowa State Fair, as recounted in his 2007 memoir, Promises to Keep:
When we left the stage, one of my staff members grabbed me and said, 'You know you didn't mention Kinnock?' I hadn't found a place to stop and slip in the standard attribution. There was a big pack of reporters who had climbed up on the stage to talk to candidates and their proxies.

All I had to do was gather the reporter and say, Hey, folks, I want to make it clear, on the record, that was a bit I end my stump speeces with, and I should have credited Kinnock. I didn't say, 'as Kinnock said.' I should have. I always do. It's his language.
I wish I had. (p.186)
Here, also, is his account of the Dowd article.
I don't remember Maureen Dowd being at the Iowa State Fair, and I don't remember her ever being out on the road with me, but she'd clearly done some reporting in the weeks since the fair. Deep in the story Dowd noted that I had credited Kinnock at various campaign appearances in August . . .

But nowhere in the story did she mention that she'd received a copy of a videotape with my State Fair close and a copy of the Kinnock ad from Dukakis's campaign. Nor did she report that the Dukakis campaign had also peddled the tape to the Des Moines Register and NBC News. (p. 190)
It was a piece he regularly used (and was known to other reporters for using), and a piece he always attributed. Except at the Iowa State Fair on August 23rd.

A week later, another New York Times story ran, this one by E.J. Dione, the guy you've been hearing analyzing the conventions for NPR the last two weeks. That story was the fruit of Dionne's chasing a nugget about Biden getting caught plagiarising a paper in law school. The headline read, "Biden Admits Plagiarism in School But Says It Was Not 'Malevolent'. It lead with this paragraph:
Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., fighting to salvage his Presidential campaign, today acknowledged ''a mistake'' in his youth, when he plagiarized a law review article for a paper he wrote in his first year at law school.
Here is how the Senator (who was at the time presiding over the Senate confirmation hearing of Reagan's Supreme Court nominee Judge Robert Bork) recalls reading the Dionne article:
Buried in the piece was the recollection of Robert Anderson, who had been in the faculty meeting where my case came up. He said the question of my mistake had been such small potatoes he hadn't even remembered it. 'It is not an uncommon occurence for a freshman to get screwed up on the acknowledgment he should have used,' Anderson had told the Times reporter. (p. 202)
Here, for what it's worth, is Biden's account of the actual law school plagiarism incident:
About six weeks into the first term I botched a paper in a technical writing course so badly that one of my classmates accused me of lifting passages from a Fordham Law Review article; I had cited the article, but not properly. The truth was, I hadn't been to class enough to know how to do citations in a legal brief. The faculty put my case on the agenda of one of their regular meetings, and I had to go in and explain myself. The deans and the professors were satisfied that I had not intentionally cheated, but they told me I'd have to retake the course the next year. They meant to put the fear of God in me; the basic message was that I had better show some discipline or I'd never get through the first year. But the dean of the law school wrote a note to the dean who oversaw my work as a resident advisor: 'In spite of what happened, I am of the opinion that this is a perfectly sound young man.' (p. 36)
The long-and-short of the '87 reporting was that Biden dropped out of the race. That, more or less, is the story.

Obviously, it serves one's interest to describe such failings in the "aw, shucks" tone so given to memoirs like Promises to Keep. For a politician, these are not light allegations. But Biden has never treated them lightly. He has described the infractions as being born of a lack of discipline, laziness, and arrogance. He has been his own worst critic in the matter.

Anyway, there's your history lesson for the day.
Read more ...

Community Oranizing II

john walker | 1:14 PM | Be the first to comment!
CNN's Roland Martin on Palin's mockery of Community Organizers:
Read more ...

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Biden on Leadership

john walker | 6:57 AM | Be the first to comment!
Check out this video from Biden's 1988 run for President in which he argues with a reporter over his "credentials" at the time. The payoff in the clip is the riff on the leader's task of "changing attitudes."
Read more ...

Biden on Palin's Speech

john walker | 6:46 AM | Be the first to comment!
"When we debate -- and, boy, she's going to be a tough debater, she's going to be a skillful debater -- I'm going to try to talk about the differences of our worldview here and what we're going to do for the country."

"I didn't hear the phrase 'middle class.' I didn't hear a single word about health care. I didn't hear a single word about helping people get to college."

Atta boy, Joe.

From CNN's "American Morning" today.
Read more ...

Palin Lies, Lies, and Then Lies Some More

john walker | 6:34 AM | Be the first to comment!
That bleeding heart tool of the angry left, the Associated Press, does some fact-checking on Palin's speech last night. Read the whole piece here.

Here's a tasty taste:
PALIN: "I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending ... and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. I told the Congress 'thanks but no thanks' for that Bridge to Nowhere."

THE FACTS: As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million. In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation. While Palin notes she rejected plans to build a $398 million bridge from Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport, that opposition came only after the plan was ridiculed nationally as a "bridge to nowhere."
Read more ...

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Community Organizing

john walker | 9:24 PM | Be the first to comment!
What is there to mock about that work? Both Palin and Guiliani ripped on Obama's experience as a community organizer tonight. For Guiliani is was a sort of inside joke among conservatives that all he had to say was, "community (pause, pause) organizer" and hearty chuckles spread throughout the room.

Palin's line had something to do with the difference between an organizer and a mayor being that a mayor actually has to make decisions. Something tells me she hasn't the faintest idea what a community organizer on the south side of Chicago would do all day.
Read more ...

The Producer (Let's Do Lunch)

john walker | 7:21 AM | Be the first to comment!
The three of us are having lunch at the Black Cow Cafe on a busy Tuesday. Rather, The Producer and I are having burgers, while the daughter is sleeping in her car seat on a chair next to us. Every bite I take of my "Frisco Burger" produces stringy sauteed onions cascading out of the bun and onto my chin. It's truly delightful.

The Producer is tired. He's just back from a weekend in Denver, and after our lunch he's headed to the office--the new office. The production company had to move from Beverly Hills to Hollywood, since the landlord kept driving up the rent. No matter, I think, Hollywood's a better locale for a production company anyway. I don't speak this.

His grizzled appearance bespeaks more oppression today than carefree style. After 18 months of struggling to get a project off the ground, he still has nothing to show for it. There are things in the works, but in the works stopped being exciting about six months ago. Now the lack of a concrete success to point to causes The Producer to question whether this business is for him.

I listen, sympathetic. I want The Producer to have success. I've enjoyed a few stolen moments in which to watch him do what a producer does, explaining to an angry director why timelines keep getting extended, demanding that a production company commit to a project or back the Hell off; he's really good.

But he's really earnest, and everything I've seen about the entertainment industry, every bit of anecdotal wisdom about it, says that the earnestness of the young is nothing but the grist for other people's mills--namely older, better-connected, wealthier peoples' mills. All this business needs to get one over on you is the ounce of trust you put in it. And by the time you discover what's going on, it's too late.

It's not yet too late for The Producer. There are promising projects on the radar. But if one of them doesn't come through soon, I don't know how much longer he'll be able to hang in. Frankly, for his sake, I hope not that much longer. There are enterprises in the world more deserving of his earnestness than this one.
Read more ...

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Andrew Sullivan on Palin

john walker | 8:15 AM | Be the first to comment!
The uber-blogger's post makes a terrible point:
The important thing for today's Republicans is that the leaders evoke the kind of cultural identity of evangelical Christians, regardless of their competence or knowledge or even interest in, you know, governing. You pick a candidate because of her gender and religion and recent baby, even if she has no record of even any opinions on foreign policy and the only opinion you can actually find opposes the critical plank of McCain's war "strategy."
This is actually what makes me nervous about the Palin pick (nervous in the sense that I love all things Joe Biden): it's marketing. Palin evokes a definite "cultural identity," and that will work with large segments of the population. Because it's the same cultural identity that elected a bumbling governor in 2000 and then re-elected him as a very unpopular president in 2004. Criticize "todays Republicans" over this all you want, but don't think for a second they don't know what they're doing. They surely do.
Read more ...

Saturday, August 30, 2008

The Waiter Chronicles Revisited

john walker | 9:16 PM | Be the first to comment!
"Good Food" is a Saturday show on the local public radio station. I don't listen to it normally, but yesterday as we drove to the museum I caught mention of the phrase "Waiter Rant" and froze the dial in place.

Waiter Rant is a crazy-popular blog written by Steve Dublanica, a blog which produced a Norton Anthology-worthy essay and subsequently an entire book, a book which currently resides on the New York Times' Best Seller List. Yesterday, Dublanica was interviewed by the host of "Good Food," Evan Kleiman. Listen to the show here.

Listening to the interview stoked my proud waiter fire, a fire that burned hot yet a year ago and then cooled after I found gainful employment in my "real" calling and quit last January. But before I took off the apron I had a correspondence with Dublanica (then known only as "The Waiter"). I posted my email to him here, and I posted (with his expressed permission) his response here.

Is this like knowing someone famous?
Read more ...

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Biden's Brag Sheet

john walker | 4:20 PM | Be the first to comment!
In anticipation of the Senator's speech before the convention tonight, I offer this link to the op-ed he and Richard Lugar wrote in 2002 on the eve of the Senate Foreign Relations' committee hearings on a possible war with Iraq.

Here's the money quote:
. . . when Saddam Hussein is gone, what would be our responsibilities? This question has not been explored but may prove to be the most critical. In Afghanistan, the war was prosecuted successfully, but many of us believe our commitment to security and reconstruction there has fallen short. Given Iraq's strategic location, its large oil reserves and the suffering of the Iraqi people, we cannot afford to replace a despot with chaos.
Read more ...

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Bad TV

john walker | 12:18 PM | Be the first to comment!
I watched some of the democratic convention on CSPAN's live feed last night, and I was appalled by the "ordinary folk" bits they rolled out.

At least twice, people took the podium to talk about how they met Barack Obama and what a great guy he is. It was difficult to watch. The people were terrible public speakers and appeared more like cardboard cutouts than living, breathing people.

It might have appeared to be good politics, but it was really bad TV. It made me want to turn it off.
Read more ...

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Both Sides of Their Face

john walker | 10:16 PM | Be the first to comment!
The McCain campaign released two ads in the hours following Obama's announcement of Joe Biden as the vice-presidential nominee, criticizing Obama both for choosing someone who had criticized him in the past and for not choosing someone who had criticized him in the past.

Hmm . . .

First, the ad criticizing Biden for his critique of Obama (and praise of McCain) in 2007:


And now for the ad criticizing Obama for not choosing Hilary Clinton, for the obvious reason that she had criticized him in the past:

Is this the best that McCain and company can do, this inane Biden vs. Obama debate footage and these cut-and-paste Clinton criticisms? And to make the same claim both ways?

Pretty sloppy.
Read more ...

A Gaffe Right Out of The Gate?

john walker | 3:15 PM | Be the first to comment!
Adele Stan at The Huffington Post has a problem with a remark Joe Biden made at the end of his speech on Saturday. Here's what he said:
"Ladies and gentlemen, my wife, Jill, who you'll meet soon, is drop-dead gorgeous. My wife, Jill, who you'll meet soon, she also has her doctorate degree, which is a problem. But all kidding aside. . . . "
As someone who is married to a doctor--not someone with a doctorate degree, but a doctor--let me say that this remark didn't bother me in the least. The "problem" in Jill Biden's PhD, the joke implies, is that she's hard to argue with, that she's not a pushover, that she's smarter than the--ahem--average Joe.

The remark was a defenses-down welcome of the viewing public into the private life of the candidate. It's the kind of thing Biden does best.
Read more ...

The LA Times Biden Coverage: Day 1

john walker | 3:06 PM | Be the first to comment!
The Sunday LA Times has no fewer than three stories on its front page about Joe. One is an exploration of the demographic and strategic considerations that seem to make up Obama's choice of the Delaware Senator as his running mate. Here's a money quote from that piece:
With Biden, Obama hopes to acquire some Scranton cred -- not only in the crucial battleground of Pennsylvania but in other states where Democrats can ill afford to lose working-class support, such as Ohio, Virginia and Florida.
And this--just out of vanity:
Obama aides said they were attracted to the Delaware senator's humble beginnings -- and his relatively modest lifestyle. He has a net worth between $59,000 and $366,000, not much for the millionaire's club known as the Senate.

"He's still one of the poorest members of the Senate," said Anita Dunn, a senior advisor to Obama's campaign. "He came to Washington to do good, not to do well for himself."
Enjoy it while it's nice.
Read more ...

Biden's First Message to Obama-ville

john walker | 2:56 PM | Be the first to comment!
Read more ...

Biden's First VP Nominee Speech

john walker | 7:37 AM | Be the first to comment!
Here's the entire speech Biden gave on Saturday in Springfield after Obama introduced him as his running mate:


A few comments:

He says "literally" a lot.
He slipped up and called the nominee "Barack America."
The ending line, "God bless America, and may he protect our troops," seems really out of character, tonally, from the rest of the speech.
Finally, Joe Biden is going to be the Vice-President.
And there was much joy in the land.
Read more ...

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Bagging (Bagels) for Biden

john walker | 1:48 PM | Be the first to comment!
If this isn't proof of the Senator's fitness for the VP job, then I don't know what is.

Read more ...

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Bagging for Biden (Who Won't Bag for Himself)

john walker | 4:33 PM | Be the first to comment!
Oh, Joe, you're so coy!

Read more ...

Monday, August 18, 2008

Bagging for Biden (for Veep)

john walker | 4:20 PM | Be the first to comment!
Today's New York Times has a profile of our favored presidential candidate of old, the Senator from Delaware, Joe Biden, positing that his strengths and weaknesses as a vice-presidential are glaringly obvious and that they are, more importantly, the same: his age, his lengthy legislative experience, and his mouth.

I fell in love with Biden a year ago after watching him in the early Democratic primary debates. I devoured his memoir and set to blogging about why he's the guy the country needs. Readers of NPH were quick to note, after Biden's candidacy failed, the deleterious effect which the blog may have had on the Senator's try. We're pressing our luck here that a similar endorsement for vice-president won't have do likewise. We're giddy at the notion.

A couple of things to clarify from the Times' profile, though:
He first told Brian Williams of NBC on “Meet the Press,” “I am not interested in the vice presidency.” But with very little prodding, a moment later he said that if Mr. Obama asked him to be his running mate, “Of course I’ll say yes.”
I saw that interview (below), and Biden's answer was the only honest one to give. "I'm not seeking it," he said, "but if asked I'll serve." That falls short of "wanting the job" in the way the profile suggests. It was a great answer.

Second:
Mr. Biden’s appeal as a national candidate is suspect. His first bid for the presidency, beginning in 1987, famously flamed out after he was caught stealing passages from a speech by Neil Kinnock, the leader of the Labor Party in Britain at the time.
The passage of Kinnock's that Biden used (the famous "platform on which to stand" line) he used repeatedly, and every time he used it he cited Kinnock as the source. In one appearance he failed to do that, and that was the appearance that got him. He acknowledges he fell down on it, but to say that he was "caught stealing" misses the mark significantly.

Whatever. Go Joe, go.



Read more ...

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Alan's Family Jewels (The Movie)

john walker | 6:43 PM | Be the first to comment!
Back in May I shared the story of my friend Alan's mom and how her long lost family jewels had been uncovered by a reporter at the Rocky Mountain News.

This past weekend Alan's mom went with Alan and his son to Denver to actually claim the jewels. Watch the video below.

Big ups to Tina Griego, the reporter who chased down the story.





Read more ...

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Tow Truck Trouble II: The Reckoning

john walker | 7:36 AM | Be the first to comment!
Not 48 hours after the tow truck theatrics in our condo complex, a drama that pitted villainous truck drivers looking to make a buck against a heroic citizenry standing up for its rights, I found myself at the mercy of the villains.

I drove out at 9:30 in the evening to pick up my mother-in-law from a CPR class she's taking at the local chapter of the Red Cross. I took this drive in a car that has never, in seven years, stranded anyone anywhere, but that had been rather finicky throughout the week with respect to its ignition switch. For three or four days prior, I had been forced into a ridiculous ritual to simply start the car: insert the key into the ignition, attempt to turn it, fail, then jiggle the key violently in the ignition until it turns. The ritual never persisted past, say, five seconds.

I sat in the Red Cross parking lot waiting for the class to let out, listening to the radio and enjoying the air conditioning. After waiting about five minutes, my conscience got the better of me and I turned off the car. How could I have known the nearly five-hour ordeal such a simple decision would effect?

As you certainly have guessed, the key wouldn't turn anymore. Only minutes after turning the car off I tried to turn it back on and failed. And failed, and failed, and failed. Finally my mother-in-law appeared, as did all of her classmates. I explained the difficulty calmly, even while violently shaking the key in the immovable ignition switch. Sweat was trickling steadily down my forehead.

Finally I called M (my new shorthand for the wife) to bring me the other key for the car. You see, this sticky key problem dogged us about a year ago until I went and got a new key. So, obviously, the other key would work. M got the baby out of bed, put her in the carseat, and drove the 1.5 miles to the now empty Red Cross parking lot.

No go. That key didn't work either. So we called the roadside assistance service we pay for through our cell phone provider. They said a tow truck would be there in 20 minutes or less. So I sent M home with her mother and the baby while I stayed to wait for the truck. It arrived around midnight, but the driver took one look at the narrow driveway leading back to the parking lot and shook his head, "nuh-uh."

"I no can do it," he explained with a shrug of his shoulders. "Truck is too big. You need smaller truck. My company no have. You ha' to call a diff'rent company." Then he left.

I redialed the roadside assistance service and explained the increasingly complicated situation: key won't turn, wheels are locked, driveway too narrow. She put me on hold for nearly thirty minutes while she appealed to nearly every tow truck company in the San Gabriel Valley. Finally she shared with me the good news that a smaller truck had been dispatched and would be there within the hour.

I don't know how long it's been since you sat in a deserted parking lot by yourself after midnight. It was a first for me. With no radio and no company, I thought about Chris McCandless, the subject of the John Krakauer book and Sean Penn film Into The Wild, a young man who ventured off into the Alaskan wilderness by himself at age 24. "Surely there is some virtue in this," I said to myself. "The isolation, the silence, the stillness. This is only making me a better person, less hurried, more flexible, more patient."

But I couldn't shake the bald outcome of McCandless' sojourn: he died. Alone. In an abandoned vehicle.

Help finally arrived an hour later that the roadside assistance operator said it would, now 2:30 in the morning. The husky driver reached under the car's hood, disconnected the transmission, chained up the car's front end, and loaded it onto the reclined bed of his truck. I watched with strained interest, even as I mentally sketched out the Wiffle Ball dimensions of the parking lot (if you hit from here, on top of the building would be a double, over it a home run. If you hit it the other way you'd have to get it through that tree for a homer . . .). We towed the car to a garage near the condo complex and left it in the empty lot. Then the generous driver ported me the half-mile down the street to the condo complex.

So, to whoever in the tow truck cosmos reads my blog and was offended by the implications of that earlier post: I'm sorry. I see now the benevolence of your profession. I will never insult you again.

Postscript: it was the keys. We paid a mechanic $175 the next day for three hours of labor that revealed that verdict.

Blurg!
Read more ...
Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

Search

Pages

Powered by Blogger.